The Importance of Digital Sharing

Today’s system of education is still structured in the ways John Dewey warned could lead to a totalitarian regime in the United States. Chairs in a room, arranged in rows and columns so all the students face the front of the class room. At the front stands the teacher. This teachers holds the power to spoon feed the students any information the teacher deems important. All the student need to do is memorize and then, on test day, regurgitate the facts on paper. Is this learning or a memory game? John Dewey envisioned open class rooms that taught children based on interests of the individual, not the institution. This system is put into actual teaching methods across the country but tends to end at the university level. Many classes, if not most, at the undergraduate level are taught in the rigid rows and columns fashion. The professor drones on for 50 to 115 minutes while students avoid repeated cramps in their hands as they attempt to take notes at a pace resembling a starship traveling at warp speed. Other students attempt some form of telepathic learning that is accomplished through a sleeping state while in the class room. Either way, what the heck makes us endure that form of mental anguish to earn or ‘get’ a grade? Well there are options out there. The readings by Gardner Campbell, Doug Belshaw, and Tim Hitchcock enlighten the educators as to possibilities of new forms of not just teaching but the sharing of information with students, peers, and the general public. The use of digital platforms such as blogs, twitter, vlogs, and the like allow for information to be shared at an instant. Immediate feedback allows for ideas to be planted, nurtured, pruned, and then cultivated as strongly rooted concepts for all to enjoy. Why do academic institutions not encourage these options? Why is it restricted to a class called contemporary pedagogy? Why not call it “alternative pedagogical practices for those not tenured and wanting to actually educate rather than just teach”? (I mean no offense to tenured professors, many I have found to be wonderful educators) The use of digital platforms does not remove the people engaged in the online discussion but rather can draw them together. This is the message of this first week of reading and it is a message that should be shared broadly and very often to remind all that teaching is not a job to be endured between academic publications by an exciting way to impact the future through those sitting in your class room.

6 thoughts on “The Importance of Digital Sharing

  1. Great post! I see you cannot get away from Dewey, he is dreamy. I could not agree more with this. How do we teach, and why do we think its effective. I think the student with telepathic powers is on to something, why sit through something they do not care about. Maybe they enjoy cooking, art, history, circus training, literally anything other than what is being taught. I think new teaching method should be experimented with on a regular basis, look at Boyer. That guy is doing something right in education.

    Like

  2. Your comment about “chairs in a room, arranged in rows and columns so all the students face the front of the class room” is interesting. It made me think of online courses because they are not taught that way. It is important to note that online courses can be especially useful for nontraditional students (such as adult learners). For example, “Nontraditional students with outside responsibilities can benefit from the flexibility online courses offer” (Green, 2015). In addition, “Online school removes the stigma of being older” and allows students to “attend distant campuses” (Green, 2015).

    Green, D. (2015, November 6). 3 Challenges Online Education Helps Adult Learners Overcome. U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved from https://www.usnews.com/education/online-learning-lessons/2015/11/06/3-challenges-online-education-helps-adult-learners-overcome

    Like

  3. Ah, the authoritarian world approaches once again. Why bother educating when we can train them, encouraging the recitation of those facts we hold dear? I find it disturbing and uncomfortably empowering at times to stand in front of a class with chairs and eyes all painted in my direction. It is a feeling of control seldom felt, but one which I neither desire nor deserve. My concern is that we continue to make the mistakes of our predecessors. As you alluded to, the efforts are being made but end at the collegiate level, that which is supposed to serve as the summit of public education and opportunity in this country. Many of us have had the luxury to preside in classrooms both resembling and detracting from the totalitarian structure you reference. Yet, we still lazily desire to ignore the “open classroom” concepts and individualized learning that possibly served us more appropriately at some point or another. Maybe the institutions only provide classrooms with this structure (I am not handy enough to redesign my classroom) or maybe we would prefer not to exert the effort needed to accommodate such changes. Regardless of these or any other possibilities, the finger pointing likely will not result in any meaningful or productive discourse. The potential of digital platforms, as they currently stand, lies in our ability to escape the physical classroom environment altogether. Whether our mental state and behavior is altered as a result, I do not pretend to know.

    Like

  4. Hmm. Totalitarian regime, eh? Is that the end goal for education? And [contemporary] pedagogy is a means to that end? I think education is a commodity, literally bought and sold, that does lead to some variation of totalitarianism. A type of conformity through a discipline that we buy into. And for what? To climb the social ladder? The familiar imagery of the classroom you describe makes me think of McBryde Hall on campus. (I was in there for the first time yesterday). The bad lighting, bare walls, and chalk boards aren’t worth the [insert tuition here] that students are expected to pay–aside from the actual content they’re learning. That type of environment isn’t conducive my learning style, which I wasn’t really cognizant about until I was irritated by my surroundings yesterday. (Maybe I’ve been spoiled with grad seminars).

    Like

  5. The beginning of your blog reminds me of the Pink Floyd song – you know which one! Dewey was considered to be pretty radical in his thoughts on education, I think his ideas may have been a little too intimidating for that generation of educators. Maybe his ideas will finally make sense to people who make the rules regarding education and therein lies the issue too – who makes those rules and do they actually understand learning…?! I know I am not providing any answers right now, maybe just more questions. Hopefully as we undertake this GEDI journey things will become clearer…

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Thanks for your post. The way you have summed it up at the end thoroughly shows the teachers responsibility. Since the teacher is the one who impacts the most, we have to have a better system for educating more prepared teachers. To our surprise, the number of people wanting to become teachers has decreased by 30%! which means that we are not on the right track!,

    Like

Leave a comment